Caravaggio, Amor Vincit Omnia, ca 1601, Gemaldegalerie, Berlin, Germany

The above is for anybody who knows me to have a good laugh at. What a fascinating and strange world we live in. This is apparently a ‘young and reckless Cupid’. Cupid triumphs over Music, Science, fame, and power. We all may indeed be cut from the same cloth as certain Angels. Amazing world we’re a part of.

The Arnolfini Portrait, Jan van Eyck


In this painting from 1434 A.D, you will see on the left a man (who, based on his left eye countenance, is a woman) we today call ‘Vladimir Putin’. In his hand, and on the right, we see Queen Elizabeth 1. Vladimir Putin was supposedly born in 19 52, Queen Elizabeth 1 was supposedly born in 15 33 and this painting was painted 1434.

Clues?

Her countenance reveals her to be the opposite gender she’s purported to be. Notice the belt around her breasts is incredibly tight, actually indenting, as if there’s nothing there at all, where as Putins chest area is very loosely covered as if concealing something. Indeed, something underneath seems to be pushing it out. Notice Putins feminine shoes. Colour wise, he’s wearing pink and purple, whereas she is wearing blue and green, inverting traditional gendered colours. Notice the supposed baby bump extends most at an anotomically impossible point/location which would mean that the babys feet would be halfway down her thighs. The reversal of the genders is further expressed through the reflection of the mirror in the background inverting the figures in view of the painter, showing us there’s what we see, and there’s a reality behind it. These are also both two people with one track minds, with one in particular, being dominant (the figure on the left). Notice that the ‘Queen’s ‘ feet are hidden from our view, for we would realise, in comparison, that they’e far too big (as with Mona Lisas hands) to be that of a womans.

The text in the background right above the mirror translates to ‘Jan Van Eyck was here’. Jans English equivalent is John, and both translate to G is gracious, John is associated with Lucifer, Van means vain, and Eyck translates to justice. Thus, this translates ‘Lucifers vain justice is here’.

Why is this Lucifers justice?

Inverting Natural Law is vengeance against its Creator


Just for a reference:


Queen Elizabeth 1

Notice the left eye countenance is completely immaterial, finding rest and home there. Do not be distracted by the hair, look only below the hairline for that is only what’s revealed in Ecyk’s portrait. Notice too in Ecyks portrait she’s hiding the full extension and her face, jawline and head for in comparison to her partner, she may dwarf him. She’s also turned to the side in addition to the hiding of the full scope of her head, whereas the figure on the left is fully extended staring frontally at the painter. She’s also positioned onm the further end of the painting, making the figure on the left appear bigger and herself smaller.


Why would they do all this?

They’re trying to teach us our material senses can decieve us, yes our eyes and our ears especially and not to be so dominated by them. Through colours, clothes and visual trickery we can believe diabolical lies. Yes, you don’t want to be lost out at see.

Is the Male actually pregnant or is this deception?

It turns out, in Classical Greek mythology, male gods could get pregnant. Indeed, Zeuz birthed Athena, Loki becoming pregnant with the evil womans monster, and many more. Therefore, the gods may have different biological laws than we, and that’s why their society functions in a more androgynous way, which at times, appears structured in a (comparative to ours) inverted fashion.

Notice there are 13 distinct figures. Jesus is not the Sun, he is the anthrapomorphisation of the constellation Pisces, and all the other figures represent the 13 Zodiac signs. Jesus is seated, priveledged in the center due to the Sun being in the Age of Pisces in our current era. Moving left to right this painting represents the figures moving in a clockwise rotation on the zodiacal wheel. Jesus represents Pisces, the next figures to our right is Aries, Taurus Gemini, Cancer, Leo and Virgo. On the farthest to our left, you see Libra, Scorpio, Ophiuchus (yes Ophiuchus), Sagittarius (functioning as the firey accuser) Capricorn and Aquarius.

The most startling revelation most often not noticed, is that, according to this painting, it is not Virgo, but Aquarius who has been discovered as being the woman (Virgo is traditionally considered the representation of Mother Mary) that is the only woman at the table. In fact, she’s being accused by Sagittarius who discovers with horror her missing Adams apple.

How could this be?

The ray expression makes Aquarius the only exclusively feminine sign in the entire Zodiac. It is a 5th Ray sign, and since all Rays above the androgynous 4th (5th, 6th and 7th) are feminine. All other signs, including Virgo, have a composite of both the masculine and feminine expressionary rays, exclusively masculine, or exclusively androgynous. The exclusively masculine signs are also part of the same element as Aquarius, showing that air in itself is only a composite of feminine and masculine, with no androgyny, a fact only shared by Eather. Therefore, Leonardo Da Vinci sought to anthropomorphise this reality. One has to wonder, whether this means that Aquarius symbol should not be ‘the Man holding the pitcher of Water’, but ‘The woman bearing the pitcher of Water’, or very simply ‘The fertile Woman’. Indeed, this now sounds like a woman about to give birth, and Aquarius’s functions to distribute truth for liberation and relief unto the world. Could Mother Mary, she who birthed the liberator, reliever and saviour of the world, therefore, be Aquarius and not Virgo? Certainly, this leads one to conclude that Mary Magdalene is Virgo (The opposition of Pisces, Opposition being a harmonious romantic relationship). Though interestingly, in the painting, Virgo is depicted as a man, a fact I’m hoping is simple reflection of the expressionary rays gender.


Which means, the Age of Aquarius (may) be dominated by this Mary Magdalene energy/figure. Does it follow that she will reincarnate as the Avatar of this Age?

Maybe the future is indeed female.


If it is simply a woman distributing truth then this application is currently running in our world today, on all publicly celebrated levels.

Why do women bare this responsibility?

Because the feminine rays (5th, 6th and 7th) are Truth/ Concrete Science, Devotion, and Illumination. So on all those fields, it is they who universally distribute it, not men. Men consume it, since the masculine rays include the 1st, 2nd, 3rd which represent Will, Love/Wisdom and Intellect. The masculine yearns for the feminine, and the feminine yearns for the masculine. The masculine is Will, Love/ Wisdom, Intellect, and yearns for Truth, Devotion and Illumination to fortify itself. Feminine is Truth, Devotion and illumination and yearns for Will, Love/ Wisdom and Intellect.

Indeed, Aquarius’s feminine ray expression finds its sacred application through the planet and Roman goddess Venus.

The most astonishing thing about this painting however, is that Da Vinci managed to capture, with perfection, the countenance of each zodiac sign.

Aries staunch determined nature is expressed through a single finger pointing up (the 7th Illuminating ray) and his energised willful (1st ray) forward leaning gate is perfectly representative of Aries. He is the ‘indignant man with the truth’ and he’ll speak it boldly. Taurus’s singular 4th ray focus is perfectly captured as he’s intensely analysing and convergently squinting at the material object of his gaze, penetrating and splitting the a rock, materially placing his body as an obstacle to protect the lady from the Firey willful man of firey action. Gemini, in his immeasurable 2nd Ray distribution of love and wisdom, is empathising and mutably undecisive in his judgement, in a whimsical, airy way percieving what’s been revealed while clutching his heart. Undeniably, Gemini is especially androgynous looking, whether this implies Gemini is a woman or whether it’s homosexual is up for debate. Certainly, Gemini has been conflated with ‘brotherly love’ in it’s conception and initiation/joining in the stars in Greek, Roman and Egyptian Mythology. Cancer, with it’s strong destructive watery material emotional lunar influence is looking to Virgo for action on what he considers an immoral deception that must be punished. Leos intense possesed eyes reveal his firey nature, his forward gait reveal the first ray of Will and his fixed gaze reveals his focus on Objective fact (of the situation) reveal the 5th Ray. Virgos countenance, as I’ve discovered with many of them in real life, is uncovered primarily through their Vulcan (esoteric Ruler), and Earth in Pisces (Joy). Their Earth in Pisces is tough but since it’s feminine water, is always yearning to be used for destructive applications. It then happily uses esoteric Ruler Vulcan to achieve these ends. Virgos beyond the 14th degree tend toward the malefic, self centred egoism in their application of this, while those before the 15th degree tend toward righteous justice. Notice that both Leo and Cancer look to him for will/Action (that which Vulcan represents) on the Material world (Earth element) based on the observation of what’s occuring in it (3rd Ray of Intellect, and non sacred Earth).

On the far left side of the table we have Libra, who’s actutely observable through his Firey energised bodily tension, their fixed gaze and their tilt forward gate. Yes, Libra is indeed identified not through Libra, but through Earth in Aries. Remember, Earth in Aries becomes identical with Capricorn in their Ray expression, encompassing 1st, 3rd and 7th Rays. To see the difference between Waters magnetic feminine receptiveness, and fires creational energisation compare the Libra figure with the Capricorn figure (who is also identified by his Earth sign, not his Sun sign). Scorpio passively (like water) hides behind Ophiuchus, whom he relies on to intellectually (3rd Ray) come to a conclusion about the situation, as he simply studies it in a 4th Ray way (that splits the atom to analyse its contents) in terms only of the emotional (astral percieving) fallout of the situation and all that will follow from it. Ophiuchus unconsciouslly studies the lack of the Adams apple with his direct Eatheric gaze. Da Vinci captured Ophiuchus’s unconscious duality nature with precision. Ophiuchus holds his hands up as if he’s calling for calm, telling others ‘don’t touch her’, or, equally likely, he’s about to get to the root of the issue and conduct a study seeing whether Aquarius has breasts. A solution getting to the root of the issue that could only have come through 6th ray. Sagittarius angrily and accusingly points at the missing Adams apple, leaning right in fully energised (representative of his 4th, 5th, 6th rays). It’s all too much for Capricorn who’s cardinally looking (with the 7th ray) at the situation. Yes, Capricorn is identified with his Earth in Cancer (Fall). Jesus is mutably (unconscious unity) compassionate and calling for calm and peace amongst the members of the table, asking them to halt their anger and condemnation, whilst seemingly personally saddened by it. He is functioning as the peacemaker. This is one of the most divine, beautiful expressions of Pisces in the world and role and place amongst the zodiac. It is the only sign which calls for calm and peace in moments of turmoil through it’s immense compassion and imagination of how existing material realities can be better.

A fundamental deduction can therefore be made- in Traditional Astrology, Air is identified with masculine, Aquarius symbol is a man, so Aquarius must be masculine. Right? However, this suggests that Aquarius is actually feminine, and the only one at that.

How could this be?

Aquarius is the only sign in the entire Zodiac with an exclusively feminine ray. Every single other Zodiac sign has at least one masculine (1st, 2nd and 3rd) or androgynous Ray (4th), irrespective of their planetary position.

Dear reader, just so you know, while typing this and looking at the image, this is the first time I have ever discovered this reality.

Leonardo Da Vinci was a genius. Thank you so Much for these revelations.

*Note did you notice Pisces and Aquarius together create a V shape? V is a sacred letter because it is the 22nd number of the Latin alphabet, it is among the most sacred numbers possible alongside, 11 and 33. 22 symbolises ‘the Master Architecht’ and ‘The Master Builder’. Remember, Jesus was a carpenter (builder), but the Master Architecht and Builder of the Universe refers to G-d. Da Vinci, in this painting is insuating a connection between G-d and Pisces and Aquarius, going in seperate directions and uniting the masculine and the feminine. It’s energy is to teach us how to ascend, and this is precisely what Jesus sought to do and indeed, the entire new testament successful does (through allegory).

Michael Angelo, Creation of Adam.

First of all, to put this image in the Vatican breaks the decree to not make any graven images of G-d. If indeed the old man on the right is meant to be G-d, breaks divine law.

With that said. First of all, notice that the old man is inside a brain. He is in the centre of the brain. This old man is therefore, very likely Jupiter/Zeus as he represents the pituitary gland. He has his arm around his wife, Juno and is surrounded by a bunch of children. When I first saw this, I thought there could be a pedophilia aspect, for this was put in the Vatican and there is an Old man surrounded by naked children. However, this could also possibly represent that within the human brain, aside from the pituitary and pineal glands, all other areas are comparatively infantile. Assuming traditional gender designations are correct, it is possible that this is not Pituitary gland but Pineal gland (Saturn) since it’s an Old man (Saturns archetypal representation) and masculine and electrical, and Jupiter is considered to be feminine and magnetic. Indeed the outstretched finger between him and Adam suggests it could be electric and they’re about to ‘zap’ each other, though this could also be Zeus’s thunderbolt.

Above all, the really interesting mystery is Why is this called ‘The creation of Adam?’ How does Saturn or Jupiter being activated by Adam himself in Adams brain render Primordial Adam into Adam? Does this mean humanity is not divine until they accomplish this? What was Adam prior to activating this maturation aspect within himself? Does one become divine through truly emulating their divine source, those Elohim, when they activate that which characterises them within himself?

I wonder how many people realise or would acknowledge in the art world today that the Old man and angels above are inside a human brain? How many would acknowledge that it even looks like a human brain?

I just googled, it came up with:

“In 1990, Frank Lynn Meshberger, M.D proposed that the painting may be hiding an anatomical depiction of the human brain and that the depicted god is superimposed on the emotional side of the brain, the limbic system.”

It took hundreds of years before an academic authority tentatively posited the theory of the overtly presented shape. This is akin to saying ‘the heavens may be hiding the fact that the Moon appears as a circle.’


You have to laugh, dear Readers. We live in a Divine comedy 🙂

The Birth of Venus, by Sandro Botticelli

Here, we have a very interesting painting. We have Venus standing in the center of a clam, in the Sea, where she’s symbolic of a Pearl. Interesting, the clam, itself is a Water bearer and Venus is represented of the 5th Sacred Ray of which the only zodiacal sign is Aquarius. This therefore has a correspondence with ‘Girl with a Pearl Earing’.

First of all, notice that these figures, with their symmetries, proportions, ratios, if this were an actual photo, would be considered non human, but Giants. The gods in all paintings, in all cultures and eras were always depicted with these same proportions, antithetical to modern day humans. The gods, if we were to view them in material manifested form, may therefore be Giants. The other figures in the image are Lucifer and Lilith (on the left) and her earthly mother (or sister) on the right. Who, dear reader, who is Venus’s Mother? Is the one on the left Lilith and the one on the right Eve? Also, is Lilith on our left (her right brain hemisphere) representative of Liliths archetypal function (freedom, liberation, love of beauty in form), and is Eve therefore, in contrast representative of the Left hemisphere of the brain (modesty, dignity, obedience). Eve is trying in vain to preserve some of Venus’s modesty through throwing a covering over her naked body, and Lucifer stands on the other side, through his manipulation of Air, to blow away the covering, eliminating any attempt at modesty. Indeed the fact that Lucifer is blowing at her is signified by Venus’s hair blowing to our right, the precise direction in which he blows.

Perhaps the answer could lie in the fact, that Venus herself is trying to preserve modesty with the way she’d covering herself while also looking very comfortable and liberated, calmly existing in her truth. This is not simply a reflection that in Boticellis era it would not have been acceptable to paint a fully nude portrait. Perhaps this duality in Venus reflects every womans battle within themselves, their very own self conception and societies temporal norms, and religious requirements. That war between their left and right hemispheres. Venus seems comfortably settled on her decision.

Another Androgynous painting veiling true gender. ‘Mona Lisa’ is an anagram for ‘Amon ISIL. Remember ‘ISIL’ is another way of pronouncing ISIS. Da Vincis former ‘Last Supper’ centered around the very issue of Gender being controversially exposed. Here he references the same concept again. It seems like it has has been an omni present theme that the finest painters throughout history sought to let us discover, hiding it in plain sight. The greatest way to reveal any beings Gender, is to look at the left eye, and Mona Lisa shows male countenance. In addition, look at her left back of the hand width, it is far too wide. Indeed, that is why the exposed right hand hides the thumb, and the pinky finger. If you had seen the right hand with all fingers outstretched, you would know this is not a Woman.

The interesting thing is if you type in ‘Male Mona Lisa’ you see Da Vinci actually created a Male version entitled ‘Salvator Mundi’

Salvatore Mundi, Leonardo Da Vinci


This figure looks remarkably similar to all depictions of Jesus (Yeshuah). Indeed, ‘Salvator’ means Saviour, and Mundi means Contempt for the world in favour of an afterlife. This is precisely what Jesus’s role was in the Gnostic Bible. The Gnostic Bible purports that Jesus thought the world was inherently evil because our divine sparks, or souls were imprisoned and confined into materiality and they must be liberated from such evil.

Indeed in this very same painting he’s doing the exact same hand gesture as Jesus himself (with the two fingers of the right arm pointing upward, symbolising right hand path ascension and with the index and middle fingers symbolising Jupiter and Saturn, with the middle finger slightly bent showing a preference for Jupiter over Saturn).

There could be a synthesis between these two paintings, reflecting that ISIS (if this is indeed who is being portrayed) is an andygonous figure, not singular of Gender. Interestingly, when I look at the left eye of this painting, I see a female countenance. All our figures in the public arena are always inverted.

It could also be putting forward the notion that the historical Jesus was ISIS. Also, it has been said many, many times, that ‘Jesus’ or ‘Yeshuah’, with his long hair is depicted strikingly in the feminine.

Notice he’s holding a Globe (like a snow globe). He’s telling us in order to ascend from our right hemispheric, left hand path world (which corresponds with his left hand) we must use and train our right eye (left hemisphere) to ascend. The Globe itself is positioned parallel to the Heart Chakra, which is where our world is located in the giant being we’re apart of.

Compare Salvator Mundi with the following painting of Jesus holding the same hand positions. The only difference being that instead of Jesus holding the Globe at the level of the Heart.

Notice that the right hand fingers are a precise mirror of Da Vincis painting. The upright Jupiter symbolises absolute and total commitment to to the greater good, and the slightly bent Saturn symbolises the neccesity to bend some of the truth whilst still proclaiming fundamental truths so as not to break Natural Law. Yes, oh yes, notice the heart chakra his left hand holds is wrapped in a crown of thorns with the Saturnian cube illuminated by fire at the top (the cross).

Girl with a Pearl Earing, Johannes Vermeer

No matter how superficially beautiful the symmetry and proportions may be, the left eye reveals all. Why? Because the eye is non material, divine perception and incompetent with the Moon, base materialistic id. That’s why 🙂

Adam and Eve, from the ‘Stanza della Segnatura’ (detail), 1511, Raphael


Who is ‘the Serpent’ according to Raphael?

According to him, Lilith is ‘the serpent’ in the Garden of Eden. If, as it has been perported, the Serpent is the Mashiach, then according to this photo the mashiach will be Lilith. Remarkably, the countenance gives away which woman has the one track mind (Lilith) and which one thinks holistically (Eve). Notice that Liliths gaze is that of Ophiuchus, the Serpent Bearer. Yet another association with the snake. Perhaps, therefore, Ophiuchus’s symbol should not be man holding a serpent, but a woman as one. Akin to Sagittarius, she’s woman in the top half of her body, and serpent (reptile) in the lower half. Yes, this is a variation to the Mermaid concept, and Sagittarius’s concept of being half human (on top) and half animal (below). Perhaps this is an allegory that if these signs are placed below the 4th Chakra (below the Sun, so Earth, Venus, Mercury, Moon) they function animalistically, whereas if they’re placed above (Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) they function humanely. If you continue reading this section you will see many more depictions of mermaids, one of which shows Lilith as the potential mother of a mermaid (Venus). How could this possible? How could a half snake woman spawn a half fish woman? Perhaps if the father was Dagon or another sea monster.

Notice too that Eve is depicted comparatively more masculine than Lilith, particularly on the forearms, hands and face.

The finest art that has ever been produced (or at least, the art that is presented to us as such), seems toward an overwhelming trend toward Liliths glorification.

Liberty Leading the People is a painting by Eugène Delacroix

An androgynous face with a full set of breasts. Empreror (ess) wears no clothes huh?

Also, what does this suggest of Lady Liberty that she encourages war and killing? Is the Empire state with the Statue of Liberty the Empire state because of Lady Liberty?

Is the encouraging and celebrating of killing in Contradistinction to the G-d of the Bible?

The above photo illustrates an honest depiction of the genders with the correct left eye countenance ascribed to the correct gender. You will see the bare lady with a material id adept left eye, and you will see the male with a non material left eye. This is correct and honest without inversion.

Lady with an Ermine by Leonardo da Vinci

Another honest painting by none other than Da Vinci himself.

A beautiful image depicting how civilisation, no matter how glorious and beautiful, is ultimately anti creation because it is anti nature. It must be destroyed for divine flora and fauna to flourish and for G-ds infinite glory to birth.

The Great Wave Off Kanagawa, Katsushika Hokusai

I highlight this image not because there’s anything especially beautiful about it, the boat design, ores, the mountain, the white foam of of the waves varying in sizes and ratio, even the fourth letter from the bottom right hand scene of the board is out of alignment with the rest, and the top half of the writing is out of alignment with the bottom half, are quite poor in light of the historical Art scene. However, this painting is beautiful precisely because despite the artists talent, it incorporates the Sacred geometric concept of the divine spiral. The application of these ancient concepts is how you transform an average painting into one that is internationally renowned for centuries.

This is where things get cooky.

Da Vinci, Michelangelo and other European Artists use the same sacred geometric concepts, but their final piece is less beautiful.

Why?

Two positives make a positive. However, one positive with one negative seems to surpass the former.

How?

A beautiful soul who has spent many lifetimes perfecting himself through sacred scripture and daily action may apply the concept of the 10 commandments, or the noble eightfold path to anchor himself into morality and right living in this life, yet again. However, the one who has never done this before, and has not been acting in accordance with them who decides for the first time to adopt them, shines with brilliance for G-ds beauty is in such stark contrast. In the European paintings, the painters individual brilliance attempt to match or even surpass the sacred geometric (G-dly element), reflective of the individualistic European trait, in the Japanese painting, G-d (expressed through divine proportions of sacred geometry) is what gives it it’s extravagant beauty, and the inherent beauty of nature is the focus. G-d in it’s purest expression will always be more stunning than individual painters talents, for an individual painter has only an infintesimal fraction of his splendour.

Also, worth noting, this was painted in 1831, nearly two hundred years ago, well before television (tell lie vision) or modern technology was created (or so we’re told). Thus, this very painting seems like this is very likely the basis for modern day animation and cartoons.

A Friend In Need by Cassius Marcellus Coolidge

Stark commentary on how modern Man solve their problems, instead of consulting one another and talking out to solve their issues, they drown their sorrows away through alcohol, gambling, and smoking. Check the time on the clock in the background, they’re gambling well into the night, completely unconscious, as they drift lost out in see (the painting).



The following paintings are fascinating images simply depicting a world after the great horror, tragedy and reset. Indeed one is 1877. The Great Resets are always during Neptune in Pisces, so there are always Mini resets every 150 years or so.

One has to wonder, how could these primitive humans in horse and buggies also be living in such megastructures as their cities they’re a part of?

This looks remarkably similar to Venus from the Birth of Venus

The Birth of Venus by Alexandre Cabanel


Above we have the same red haired Mermaid character 3 times, repeated by 3 different painters from 3 different time frames and countries. Ariel, the character that was portrayed could therefore be accurately representing the reality.

St. John the Baptist, 1513 to 1516

‘Your answers are up there’. The merging of the concepts of Theology and Astrology (AstroTheology). ‘St John’ looks remarkably androgynous.

Karl Bryullov, The Last Day of Pompeii (detail). 1830-1833


Don’t be this guy- Man looking up at the incoming punishment for his societies (and maybe his own) immorality.



Michael Neil Rottondo
2023