Through Socionics scientific bent, and innovative expansive contemplation, they have developed hundreds of theoretical frameworks, theories, dichotomies usually in the form of Tables, Models, Dichotomies, and verbal Descriptions. These have sub theories, adaptions, and expansions by individual theorists seeking to address flaws and improve real world applicability. All seeking to determine the true nature of Personality, and human cognition. For example. The theory of Intertype relations, which put forth the notion that all types interact with one another in a predictable, replicable, and consistent manner. Through reflection and experience many find these descriptions true and enlightening. It can then help individuals navigate future relationships, and obtain a wiser understanding of past interactions, and relationships. Underlying the categorical capacity for human relationships, is that immutable, cognitive preferences reliably interact with others immutable cognitive preferences . For example. Types interaction with others whose creative is their Id/Observation function (Labelled the Benefactor/Beneficiary relation), will likely dislike that person. The fundamental reason for this friction is due to the asymmetrical, non reciprocal and one sided nature, largely favouring one partner. The creative function, a feature prominent in human social encounters, is one partners socially expressed creative strength (due to its functional placement), and another partners DSF (their non socially expressed absolute weakness). This is one of 16 intertype relational possibilities. These can be expanded when applications of other theories such as sub-types within types (the idea that the same types can lean more heavily on their dominant or creative function, and even that the same types can lean more heavy on 8 of the cognitive functions period) , come into play. 16 becomes 32 in the former case, and 128 in the latter. Finally, there are elaborate descriptions written by different theorists in different languages illustrating through story, and metaphor the nature of the cognitive interactions.

Model R, by Michael Neil Rottondo


Model R. Qualitative definitional adaptions


Socionics Model A’s Ni definition (regardless of, and applied to all cognitive positions):

Ni: Perception of Internal dynamics of fields



Model Rs Ni Lead function definition

Ni+ Subjective right hemispheric time based conscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields.

Ni- Objective right hemispheric experiential based conscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of local fields.


Model Rs Ni Mobilising function definition

Ni+ Subjective right hemispheric normative based unconscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields
Ni- Objective right hemispheric experiential based unconscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of local fields


How did I get there?


+ Subjective, Universal
–  Objective, Local

So

Traditional Socionics definition of:
Ni- Perception of Internal Dynamics of Fields.

Becomes

Ni+ Subjective Perception of internal dynamics of Universal fields
Ni- Objective Perception of internal dynamics of Local fields.

Furthermore:

Brain hemispheres correspondence with Information Elements-

Left Hemisphere- Thinking, Feeling
Right Hemisphere- Sensing, Intuition

It is ideal for a right hemisphere individual to be a Lead in sensing or intuition, and for a left brained person to be a Lead in Thinking, or Feeling. One should lead with their constantly ‘switched on’ strengths.

Information Elements correspondance to Perception or Judgement

Thinking, Feeling- Judgement
Sensing, Intuition- Perception

Information Elements (IEs) correspondence to Physics structural elements of life (in true ordering).

Intuition- Time
Sensing- Space
Feeling- Energy
Thinking- Matter

The Law of matter and energy is below the law of time and space, for matter (energies densified manifest expression) transmutes based on the time and spatial environments they’re in, diversifying matter and thus, energies expression.

So, it can be said the right hemisphere is indeed the Causal Hemisphere (as intuition and sensing are exclusively controlled by it), however the Left Hemisphere is profoundly important for success and flourishment operating in the material world of potential.

The opposites between the Information Elements and the elements of life align. Quantum Physics tells us that all matter is created by vibrating atoms, and at a deeper level still, atoms are created by electrical, non visible dynamic (whirling) energy fields. Thus, expanding well up from the Nano, the human being can either Judge the source/cause (energy) or it’s manifest expression/effect (matter) in the thinking (matter)/feeling (energy) functional axis.

If ones natural state of being is externally perceiving objective space, they are likely an ESXP type. If ones natural state of being is internally contemplating spatially accumulated details and synthesising these into a cohesive whole, they’re likely ISXJ. When an individual forces himself to be conscious of the time concept, he is likely Intuitive. When one internally catalyses energy within himself, they’re using Feeling. When one is aware of tangible, material objects they’re Thinking. Thus all cognitive functions align with traditional conceptions of ‘thinking’, but thinking in Socionics designations is simply limited to the judgement of material objects. All kinds of associations can be hypothesised for this. It is more than likely that Engineers are primarily material thinkers, Philosophers and scientists are primarily Intuitive perceivers, Doctors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Nurses and all people-oriented professions are primarily non materially observable, abstracted Feelers, and spatially detailed professions like Architecture, Fine Arts, Music would be primarily be spatial-sensory perceivers. There is of course cross over as each type has two primary strengths, but more than likely the lead 4 dimensional function is more likely to manifest

Now, Socionics Model A can be significantly expanded upon:


Model A definitions:

Ni+Perception of internal dynamics of Fields.
Ni- Perception of internal dynamics of Fields.


Model R definitions:

Ni+ Subjective right hemispheric perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields.
Ni- Objective right hemispheric perception of internal temporal dynamics of local fields.


Model R Information Element definitions (so far):

Ni+Subjective right hemispheric perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields.
Ni- Objective right hemispheric perception of internal temporal dynamics of local fields.
Fe+ Subjective left hemispheric judgement of internal energetic dynamics of universal objects
Fe- Objective left hemispheric judgement of internal energetic dynamics of local objects
Si+ Subjective right hemispheric perception of external spatial dynamics of universal fields
Si- Objective right hemispheric perception of external spatial dynamics of local fields
Te+ Subjective left hemispheric judgement of external material dynamics of universal objects
Te- Objective left hemispheric judgement of external material dynamics of local objects
Se+ Subjective right hemispheric perception of external spatial static of universal objects
Se- Objective right hemispheric perception of external spatial static of local objects
Ti+ Subjective left hemispheric judgement of external material static of universal fields
Ti- Objective left hemispheric judgement of external material static of local fields
Fi+Subjective left hemispheric judgement of internal energetic static of universal fields
Fi– Objective left hemispheric judgement of internal energetic static of local fields
Ne+ Subjective right hemispheric perception of internal temporal static of universal objects
Ne- Objective right hemispheric perception of internal temporal static of local objects


There is 4 additional components in the above list, being the +, – nature (subjective, universal and objective, local + – polarity), the brain hemispheres used, whether the function is judgement or perception, and which physics element is being judged/perceived.


Furthermore


Functions dimensionality

In the + Polarity functions are broken down into 4 dimensions

4 dimensional- Time based perception/judgement
3 dimensional- Situational perception/judgement
2 dimensional- Normative perception/judgement
1 dimensional- Experiential perception/judgement


In the – Polarity, the 1 Dimensionality is also broken down into 4 qualitative definitions based on cognitive position.

1 dimensional- Experiential perception/judgement that is most powerful (Very strong, Lead).
1 dimensional- Experiential perception/judgement that is second most powerful (Strong, Creative)
1 dimensional- Experiential perception/judgement that is third most powerful (Moderately weak, mobilising)
1 dimensional- Experiential perception that is the weakest and most primitive. (Weak, Dual seeking function)

Applied

+ signs (INFp, INFj, ENTp, ENTj, ESFj, ESFp, ISTp, ISTj)

Lead– 4 dimensional (time based perception/judgement)
Demonstrative- 1 dimensional but the highest power of experiental perception/judgement)
Creative- 3 Dimensional (Situational Judgement/Perception)
Ignoring- 1 Dimensional but second highest power for experntial perception)
Role- 2 Dimensional (Normative Perception/Judgement),Mobilising- 1 Dimensional (3rd most powerful experential perception/judgement)PolR- 1 Dimensional + Perception (Experiential perception/judgement of the Subjective and Universal, very weak)
Dual Seeking Function- 1 Dimensional Experential Perception/Judgement, The weakest experiential perception/judgement, and the function most highly desired in partners, hence its name

The – signs (INTp, INTj, ISFp, ISFj, ENFp, ENFj, ESTj, ESTp) have the same formula in reverse

Lead- 1 dimensional but the highest power of experiental perception/judgement)
Demonstrative- 4 dimensional (time based perception/judgement)
Creative-1 Dimensional but second highest power for experntial perception)
Ignoring- 3 Dimensional (Situational Judgement/Perception)
Role- 1 Dimensional (3rd most powerful experential perception/judgement)
Mobilising- 2 Dimensional (Normative Perception/Judgement),
PolR- 1 Dimensional Experential with subjective, universal Perception/Judgement,
Dual Seeking Function- 1 Dimensional experiential with objective, Local perception/judgement

Conscious and unconscious functions?

Conscious and unconscious have no relation to Information Elements, but are dependent on their placement in the cognitive stack.

Thus

Conscious functions- Ego (Lead, Creative functions), Super-Ego (Role, PolR functions)
Unconscious functions- Id (Mobilising, Dual Seeking Function), Super Id (Ignoring, Demonstrative functions).

So

An INFp would be conscious in all + functions, these being Ni+, Fe+, Si+, and Te+. An INTp would be conscious in all – functions, being Ni-, Te-, Si- and Fe-. Therefore, all types are conscious or unconscious exclusively in the + (Subjective, Universal) or – (Objective, Local) polarity.

Therefore


Ni+ in a lead function INFp would be:

Subjective right hemispheric time based conscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields.


Conversely, Ni+ in a mobilising role becomes:

Subjective right hemispheric situational based unconscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields.


Similarly

Ti+ in lead function becomes-

Subjective left Hemispheric time based conscious judgement of external material static of universal fields.


Ti+ in mobilising function becomes-

Subjective left hemispheric situational based unconscious judgement of external material static of Universal fields



Socionics Model As ‘Perception of internal dynamics of fields’ has thus 6 additional dimensions.


So, the definitions of all functions is dependent on their placement in ones Psychological archetype,



What are the subtlest psychological functions?

Functions which perceive internal (abstracted, non materially visible) stimuli as well as fields (that which in the quantum field creates all life) are subtler bodies of perception. These are the Intuition and Feeling. Thus, INFX personality types are more sensitive to the undertapestry of reality and less adept at dealing with material. Of these two, the dynamics (the electrical whirling motionthat creates atoms which creates reality) is the correct perception. Thus the INFJ (MBTI) and INFp (Socionics) is indeed consciously functioning on the subtlest level


5th Psychological function?

There is something higher which time and space bows to and that is Eather. The invisible cause of material manifestation, the vibrating atoms that creates the entire world with it’s 4 main elements. Time and space can be recreated by the invisible eatheric vibrating atoms which constructs our material energetic world and can go back and forth through time and space.


Correspondence of psychological functions and Platonic states of matter

Solid- Thinking (Matter)
Liquid- Time (Intuition)
Gas- Space (Sensing)
Plasma- Emotion (Energy)
Magnetism- Cause (Source)


Model R Information Elements definitions (assuming all Ies are placed in the Lead function

Ni+ Subjective right hemispheric time based conscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of universal fields.
Ni- Objective right hemispheric experiential based conscious perception of internal temporal dynamics of local fields.
Fe+ Subjective left hemispheric time based conscious judgement of internal energetic dynamics of universal objects
Fe- Objective left hemispheric experiential based conscious judgement of internal energetic dynamics of local objects
Si+ Subjective right hemispheric time based conscious perception of external spatial dynamics of universal fields
Si- Objective right hemispheric experiential based conscious perception of external spatial dynamics of local fields
Te+ Subjective left hemispheric time based conscious judgement of external material dynamics of universal objects
Te- Objective left hemispheric experiential based conscious judgement of external material dynamics of local objects
Se+ Subjective right hemispheric time based conscious perception of external spatial static of universal objects
Se- Objective right hemispheric experiential based conscious perception of external spatial static of local objects
Ti+ Subjective left hemispheric time based conscious judgement of external material static of universal fields
Ti- Objective left hemispheric experiential based conscious judgement of external material static of local fields
Fi+Subjective left hemispheric time based conscious judgement of internal energetic static of universal fields
Fi– Objective left hemispheric experiential based conscious judgement of internal energetic static of local fields
Ne+ Subjective right hemispheric time based conscious perception of internal temporal static of universal objects
Ne- Objective right hemispheric experiential based conscious perception of internal temporal static of local objects